I walked by a construction site today and discovered some accidental art.
accidental art.
Professional architectural photographs have one thing in common: they almost never have people in them. Browse any architectural magazine and you'll notice this, rather weird thing. Why is that?
I've come up with some explanations for the lack of humans:
There are, of course, reasons why people should definitely be in these photos:
It is interesting to see that computer-generated 3D visualizations of buildings often include people. It is much easier to use virtual persons since you can place whoever you want, wherever you want. In real life that's more challenging.
Today I made a brief visit to Porvoo, a Finnish town that originates from the 13th century. King of Sweden granted it town rights in 1346. The older part of the city is charming with its old wooden houses.
The town was quite busy. I had a couple of minutes to take some photos with my iPhone.
Here are awesome photos the I've picked from the Flickr collection of the Swedish National Heritage Board. They are from 1880s onwards and present scenes from Europe.
More information on the photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/swedish_heritage_board/.
>I like to use photographs in my PowerPoint or Keynote presentations. Good photos evoke emotions.
Choosing photographs for your presentation is not an easy task. Best photos communicate your idea clearly and at the same time offer a slightly intriguing perspective. Poor photos are self-evident and unoriginal.
Here are examples of stock photos that I cannot recommend:
These conceptual photos were perhaps once original. Due to overuse they are now just tiresome.
Photo: iStockphoto
P.S. Even if this particular type of photo is on my list I like iStockphoto very much!